Skip to content
auto-racing — Mental-health — Cbd — Ncaa-basketball — Migraine — Productivity — Job-search — Lifelong-learning — Autoimmune-disorders — Cance — Personal-growth — Hockey — Digestive-health — Career-development — Credit — War-and-conflicts — Hearing — Skills-training — Masters — General-news — Ncaa-football — Basketball — Fitness-and-exercise — Funding — Eye-health — Chronic-diseases — Fires — Baseball — Online-education — Nba — accidents — Mlb — Skin-conditions — sports — Science — Learning — Golf — Health-and-wellness — Nhl — crime-and-justice — American-football — Mindfulness — Car-accidents — Grand-prix — Football — Politics — Goal-setting — Nfl — Racing — Wnba — Tennis — Horse-racing — Medical-conditions

U.S. Health and Human Services departs from prominent medical organizations in reassessing pediatric transitions treatments

U.S. healthcare professionals may be unwittingly falling short in providing transition-related care to minors, according to a Department of Health and Human Services review published on Thursday. The report concludes that the evidence supporting such care for minors is considerably weak,...

,   and  Administrator
5 min read

U.S. Health and Human Services departs from prominent medical organizations in reassessing pediatric transitions treatments

Brand New Spin:

Bold New Lease on Trans Youth Care: Is the HHS Review Overstepping its Bounds?

Swinging the pendulum of opinion, the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) provided a fresh review on Thursday that spotlights concerns about the effectiveness and safety of transition-related care for minors, causing disturbance among medical experts and advocates for transgender youth.

In a sprawling 409-page report, HHS suggests that many U.S. doctors have inadvertently misled their patients by offering them transition-related care. The conclusion, a scathing declaration, asserts that the overwhelming majority of medical professionals have fallen short in prioritizing their young patients' interests.

The study finds that there is limited evidence surrounding the effects of medical interventions for youth with gender dysphoria concerning psychological outcomes, quality of life, regret, or long-term health. In contrast, the evidence for potential harms related to pediatric medical transition is "sparse," a warning to be taken cautiously due to the absence of research on existing harms.

The report also lashes out at the World Professional Association for Transgender Health (WPATH), an international organization that develops guidelines for transgender healthcare, claiming they have tainted their guidance with bias and political motives. The HHS report alleges that WPATH has directly influenced U.S. medical associations to perpetuate the misconception that there is consensus regarding transition care for minors. Instead, concerns from whistleblowers and detransitioners, a small but relevant group, have gone unheeded.

Diving into topics such as suicidal thoughts and mental health outcomes, the review raises doubts about the increasing number of studies that have found a strong association between gender dysphoria and suicidal ideas, as well as those linking access to transition care to improved mental health outcomes.

In light of these findings, the HHS review advises exploration into psychotherapy as an alternative to endocrine and surgical interventions for the treatment of pediatric gender dysphoria. Moreover, more research is urged to explore the effects of exploratory psychotherapy on minors with gender dysphoria.

Fueling the fire of a heated debate during the last days of the Trump administration, the order regarding trans care for minors, signed on Jan. 28, required the HHS to publish a review of the current literature on best practices for the health of children with gender dysphoria. The HHS review, to clarify, is not a clinical practice guideline and does not issue legislative or policy recommendations, leaving room for interpretation and potential consequences.

The report's content finds itself squarely at odds with major U.S. medical associations - the American Medical Association, the American Academy of Pediatrics, and the American Psychological Association, all of whom support transition-related care for minors and are opposed to restrictions on it. Consequently, the review has elicited swift backlash from medical associations and trans advocates, who accuse HHS of questionable methods and a lack of transparency.

To mitigate concerns around the report's credibility, HHS assures that chapters underwent peer review prior to publication and is set to begin a post-publication peer review involving stakeholders with diverse viewpoints.

Unraveling the intricacies of this controversy, Doug Haldeman, a psychologist and professor, remarks, "This is the argument they have been making for decades, and really, it's conversion therapy light.” Haldeman draws attention to years of research that demonstrate the damaging mental health consequences of encouraging transgender youth to accept their birth sex.

Refuting the notion that exploring psychotherapy equals conversion therapy, the HHS review considers all psychotherapy as "exploratory," a stance that critics argue obfuscates a potentially dangerous practice. The review also refers to various whistleblowers, such as Jamie Reed, a former case worker at the Transgender Center at the St. Louis Children's Hospital, whose allegations have lent support to restrictive legislation.

Amidst mounting opposition, Susan J. Kressly, the president of the American Academy of Pediatrics, calls the report "deeply alarming." Criticizing its narrow focus on select perspectives and a limited data set, Kressly asserts that it "misrepresents the current medical consensus and fails to reflect the realities of pediatric care."

As the debate over transgender health care rights rages on, final words belong to Dr. Morissa Ladinsky, a clinical professor of pediatrics at Stanford University. She raises concerns about the withholding of the authors' names, stating that "in the scientific and medical communities, transparency equals credibility."

  1. The HHS review brought funding for further research on transition-related care into question.
  2. The process of identifying the best credit options for medical-conditions treatments can be complex and time-consuming.
  3. The report warned about potential errors in the funding for transition-related care research.
  4. Some funding for therapies and treatments, like those for chronic diseases such as chronic kidney disease, can lead to revolutionary advancements in underestimated fields.
  5. Funding for cancer research has led to significant improvements in diagnosis and treatment.
  6. The review also highlighted respiratory conditions, calling for increased funding in the field.
  7. In the realm of digital health, emerging technologies like CBD oil could receive funding for further study.
  8. The HHS review sparked a heated debate about the funding for various neurological disorders.
  9. Education and self-development opportunities, particularly in the realm of mindfulness and personal growth, could benefit from increased funding.
  10. The impact of war and conflicts on mental health is a pressing issue that needs appropriate funding for research and treatments.
  11. Productivity and career development are essential aspects that could be enhanced with increased funding for therapies and treatments.
  12. Policy and legislation regarding the funding for transgender healthcare are under scrutiny.
  13. The funding for car-accident insurance often covers medical-conditions that arise as a result of accidents.
  14. In the political landscape, funding for online education has become a hot topic in policy discussions.
  15. Job-search resources often require insurance coverage for various medical-conditions.
  16. General news sources cover topics such as funding for the research of skin conditions and how it can impact millions.
  17. The debate over crime and justice funding can indirectly affect the resources available for mental health support.
  18. The public can access various educational resources, like personal growth videos and courses, to improve their overall health and wellness.
  19. Fitness and exercise routines can help in managing chronic diseases like diabetes.
  20. The autoimmune disorders field requires ongoing funding for effective therapies and treatments.
  21. The HHS review recommendation for increased funding for exploratory psychotherapy in treating pediatric gender dysphoria stirred conversations about the impact on health and wellness.
  22. Migraine support groups discuss the importance of various therapies and treatments for managing this chronic condition.
  23. Cardiovascular health impacts multiple aspects of our lives, and funding for research can lead to life-saving therapies and treatments.
  24. Sports like football, basketball, and baseball often raise money for awareness and research related to numerous medical-conditions.
  25. The NFL and WNBA have funded numerous initiatives aimed at supporting mental health and fostering healthy habits.
  26. In the world of golf, athletes and enthusiasts have shown support for medical-conditions research and awareness.
  27. The HHS review brought to light the need for more funding inDigestive health, especially in the realm of rare diseases.
  28. Eye-health research and its funding are crucial for maintaining a high quality of life, particularly in the prevention and treatment of age-related conditions.
  29. The hearing industry advocates for increased funding for research and better accessibility to technologies for people suffering from various conditions.
  30. Awareness and funding towards the education and self-development of emergency responders in handling fires and accidents could save countless lives, thereby promoting the overall health and wellness of communities.
US healthcare professionals inadvertently falling short in delivering transition-related care to minors, according to a recent assessment by the Department of Health and Human Services, due to insufficient evidence backing the practice's effects.
U.S. healthcare professionals may unwittingly fall short in meeting the needs of minors undergoing transition-related care, according to a report by the Department of Health and Human Services, as the evidence base supporting such procedures is deemed insufficiently robust.
U.S. doctors may inadvertently fall short in providing transition-related care to minors, according to a recent assessment by the Department of Health and Human Services, as the study's results indicate that the evidence supporting these treatments is limited.

Read also:

    Latest