Skip to content

Older employees' complaints of disturbance by youthful, talkative coworkers deemed not age-related harassment, according to UK tribunal decision

Young office administrator expresses struggles with 'time-wasting excess' and 'lack of productivity' among boisterous and noisy younger coworkers

Older colleagues' work environment disrupted by younger, chatty coworkers, tribunal in UK decides,...
Older colleagues' work environment disrupted by younger, chatty coworkers, tribunal in UK decides, deeming it not a form of age harassment.

UK Tribunal Rules Out Age Harassment Claim for Administrator Disturbed by Boisterous Colleagues

In a recent ruling, an employment tribunal in Watford, Hertfordshire, determined that older employees being disturbed by noisy and boisterous younger colleagues does not constitute age harassment under UK law.

The case in question involved Catherine Ritchie, an administrator in her late 60s who worked for an electrical engineering company. Ms. Ritchie, who was the oldest employee at the company, found it difficult to work due to extreme time wasting and low productivity from her noisy and boisterous younger colleagues. She took her grievances, including noise and distractions caused by her colleagues, to an employment tribunal.

According to UK law, age harassment requires unwanted conduct related to a person's age that has the purpose or effect of violating their dignity or creating an intimidating, hostile, degrading, humiliating, or offensive environment. Simply being disturbed or annoyed by younger colleagues' loud behavior does not meet this threshold. There must be evidence that the conduct is because of age and creates a negative environment linked to age discrimination.

In this case, the tribunal concluded that Ms. Ritchie's perception of noisy and disruptive behavior as harassment was not reasonable. They noted that Ms. Ritchie's expectation for silence and professionalism from her colleagues was unreasonable, and she felt disrespected when she asked for quiet and was denied the option to work from home.

Ms. Ritchie expressed disapproval towards her colleagues engaging in personal conversations during work hours and experienced physical discomfort, including a pounding headache and a hoarse voice, from having to talk loudly to be heard. However, the tribunal considered her colleagues' behavior to be within the bounds of ordinary workplace disturbances and did not amount to unlawful harassment.

One of her managers told her to focus on reaching her targets and not be concerned with office distractions. No information was provided about the outcome of the employment tribunal.

Employers are responsible for preventing harassment linked to protected characteristics like age but that does not extend to ordinary workplace disturbances unless they amount to unlawful harassment. The tribunal's ruling serves as a reminder that employees should approach workplace disturbances with a reasonable and understanding attitude, and that employers have a duty to ensure a fair and respectful work environment for all employees.

Read also:

Latest