Skip to content

Comprehending Compliance with the WARN Act During Terminations and Natural Calamities (SHRM-SCP)

Understand the implications of the WARN Act during layoffs caused by acquisitions and natural disasters. Gain insights into potential exceptions and the significance of seeking legal counsel.

SHRM-SCP Guidance: Navigating Compliance with the WARN Act During Terminations and Emergency...
SHRM-SCP Guidance: Navigating Compliance with the WARN Act During Terminations and Emergency Situations

Comprehending Compliance with the WARN Act During Terminations and Natural Calamities (SHRM-SCP)

In the event of layoffs resulting from acquisitions or natural disasters, employers must comply with the Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification (WARN) Act. This federal law, enacted to protect employees, requires advance notice of plant closings and mass layoffs.

1. **Federal WARN Act Exemptions for Natural Disasters:** The WARN Act provides an exception for layoffs caused by natural disasters such as floods, earthquakes, or storms. Employers are not obligated to provide the usual 60-day advance notice if the layoffs are caused by a natural disaster, provided that affected employees are notified as soon as practicable and that the employer gives a brief statement of the basis for reducing the notice period.

2. **Impact of Acquisition on WARN Obligations:** When an acquisition occurs, WARN Act requirements can become complicated. The acquiring employer may be liable for WARN notices if they continue operations and conduct layoffs. The timing and nature of the acquisition (e.g., asset purchase vs. stock purchase) affect WARN liability. Employers must carefully assess if layoffs post-acquisition qualify as a "mass layoff" or "plant closing" under WARN, considering combined employee counts and timing to determine notice obligations.

3. **State WARN Acts May Differ:** State WARN Acts may have additional or stricter requirements. For example, Washington State has a more stringent "mini-WARN" law that applies to employers with 50 or more employees, requires 60 days' advance notice, and broadens the definition of mass layoffs. Employers must be aware of these differences to ensure compliance.

4. **Layoffs Due to Natural Disaster Following Acquisition:** Even though the federal WARN Act’s natural disaster exception may apply, the employer should determine whether the layoff qualifies under this exception, confirm if state WARN laws apply and their requirements, carefully document the natural disaster’s role in causing the layoffs, and provide notice “as soon as practicable” explaining the shortened notice due to the disaster.

5. **When to Consult Legal Counsel:** Given the complexity—particularly when an acquisition and natural disaster intersect—legal counsel should be consulted to evaluate the applicability of federal vs. state WARN laws, interpret complex definitions of mass layoffs post-acquisition, assess potential liabilities for failing to provide proper notice, prepare compliant notices addressing both the acquisition and disaster contexts, navigate penalties and potential litigation risks, and ensure compliance with additional state-specific requirements such as those in Washington.

In conclusion, while the WARN Act may offer exemptions for layoffs due to natural disasters, the specifics can be complex, especially when acquisitions are involved. Consulting an attorney can help ensure the company avoids potential liability for WARN Act violations. Employers should carefully consider their obligations under both federal and state laws to protect their employees and their business.

[1] Washington State Department of Labor & Industries. (n.d.). WARN Act. Retrieved from https://www.lni.wa.gov/workers-rights/employers/laws-rules-and-policy/laws/wash-rev-code-49.44/ [2] U.S. Department of Labor. (n.d.). Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification (WARN) Act. Retrieved from https://www.dol.gov/agencies/eta/layoff/warn [3] SHRM. (n.d.). WARN Act. Retrieved from https://www.shrm.org/resourcesandtools/legal-and-compliance/state-and-local-advisory/pages/warn-act.aspx [4] Nolo. (n.d.). The WARN Act: What Employers Need to Know. Retrieved from https://www.nolo.com/legal-encyclopedia/the-warn-act-what-employers-need-to-know-30203.html

  1. To promote a healthier and more productive workplace, employers can consider implementing workplace-wellness programs that focus on both physical health and mental health. Such programs may offer resources for stress management, exercise, nutrition, and mental health services.
  2. Employers must recognize the crucial role that science plays in health and wellness initiatives. By staying informed about the latest scientific research, employers can make informed decisions that support employee health, encourage wellness, and ultimately contribute to increased productivity and job satisfaction.

Read also:

    Latest